6 dated source summaries from 2018-11-26 to 2018-12-13, with original links and related topics.
These English summaries describe the original Korean posts. Dates belong to the source posts. Earlier posts may name Secret, DA or NOTE; those names describe the source’s historical context. Case reports and clinic explanations are kept separate from published research.
This reported case describes a man seeking improvement of established forehead lines. The writer distinguishes habitual forehead effort from eyelid-opening weakness and discusses endoscopic forehead surgery adapted to short hair. A one-month comparison and possible residual-line treatment illustrate individualized planning, while also showing that not every line disappears with lifting.
In this post, the writer uses eyelid anatomy to question the assumption that a larger outline crease is always preferable. The discussion considers tarsal dimensions, skin characteristics and the effort required to open the eye. A buried-crease example accompanies advice to select shape and technique through examination rather than a desired measurement alone.
This reported case concerns thin tip skin and visible cartilage following earlier L-shaped implant surgery. The writer describes replacing bridge support and using the patient's septal cartilage for the tip, while discussing the circulation risk of separating adherent graft material. The early result is presented with attention to tissue condition rather than simply increasing projection.
This reported revision addresses bilateral crease weakening after an earlier incisional operation, together with reduced eyelid-opening strength. The writer describes scar management, a revised crease plan and opening adjustment. A three-month comparison is accompanied by a specific limitation: a separate childhood scar remained because available skin did not permit complete removal.
This reported revision case concerns a high bridge and a nose perceived as short or upturned after earlier surgery. The writer describes reconsidering implant height in relation to skin capacity and changing tip support with ear cartilage. A ten-month comparison illustrates the reported contour change without making maximum bridge height an aesthetic objective.
This reported case concerns fluctuating extra folds, unequal creases and late-day eye-opening fatigue in a man. The writer describes nonincisional eye-opening correction and a one-month comparison, including a reported change in hollow appearance without fat transfer. The example illustrates related functional and contour concerns, not proof that opening correction treats all upper-lid volume loss.