12 dated source summaries from 2018-09-20 to 2018-10-12, with original links and related topics.
These English summaries describe the original Korean posts. Dates belong to the source posts. Earlier posts may name Secret, DA or NOTE; those names describe the source’s historical context. Case reports and clinic explanations are kept separate from published research.
In this brief post, the writer reflects on autumn routines before introducing clinic skin treatments for pores, uneven tone and oiliness. Radiofrequency is explicitly distinguished from a true laser despite informal naming. The post describes a service offering, rather than presenting a clinical series or independently measured evidence for painless treatment and immediate recovery.
In this recovery discussion, the writer describes bruising, washing concerns and altered scalp sensation after endoscopic brow lifting. Itching, tightness and intermittent tingling receive particular attention, alongside a five-day case illustration. The post records historical practice advice; its reassurance that symptoms resolve should not replace examination of persistent or unusual postoperative changes.
This reported case concerns a nasal hump, deviation and obstruction after an earlier injury. The writer separates bony and cartilaginous contributions, describes adjusting bone inclination and septal alignment, and discusses using native cartilage. The one-month report illustrates combined cosmetic and functional planning without proving that native tissue eliminates surgical risks.
This reported male case combines reduced opening strength with concerns about eye width. The writer describes a small buried crease, nonincisional opening correction and lateral-corner surgery, followed at one month. The discussion relates the desired low-visibility crease to the overall eye shape, without establishing that combined procedures are necessary for every similar concern.
This reported revision case combines deviation, implant movement, visible tip material and a request for more bridge definition. The writer describes evaluating bony width rather than simply increasing height, then changing implant and tip support. A one-month comparison illustrates the reported early contour; numerical swelling estimates in the source are not individualized predictions.
This reported male case describes skin coverage, forehead compensation and a heavy visual feeling during periods of fatigue. The writer discusses removing excess skin while designing a small crease and presents a one-month comparison. The post addresses fear of a conspicuous fold, but its favorable scar claims remain a description of this example.
This reported case concerns persistent blockage after prior septal surgery, together with a drooping tip and a broad, deviated bridge. The writer describes reassessing the septum, using remaining septal and ear cartilage and adjusting the nasal bones. The early account combines functional and contour concerns rather than treating bridge height as the only objective.
This reported case concerns a covered crease and shortened brow-to-eye distance many years after eyelid surgery. The writer describes brow lifting instead of further crease enlargement and discusses changing the brow angle. The patient had overseas travel plans, but the early recovery account and historical washing instructions should not determine another patient's travel or postoperative schedule.
In this post, a first-time eyelid case illustrates why thicker tissue and greater skin excess can affect technique choice even in a young patient. The writer discusses an incision-based crease and a one-month review, while correcting the impression that the clinic offers only one operation. The central message is selection by anatomy rather than technique branding.
This reported case concerns a natural crease that intermittently disappeared or formed extra folds. The writer describes selecting a buried-suture approach because the skin was thin, excess was limited and opening strength was judged normal. Seven-month follow-up is presented, alongside a discussion of circumstances in which an incision-based approach may be more appropriate.
This academic account describes presenting work on minimally invasive treatment of facial fat-transfer complications at the 2018 meeting in Chicago. The writer names research collaborators and distinguishes the presentation from a future planned paper. The post explains the rationale for avoiding direct large incisions, without proving superiority over other approaches from the account alone.
This reported case concerns cheek descent and marionette-region heaviness following prior zygomatic and jaw reduction, with limited benefit from earlier treatments. The writer describes a limited-incision lift addressing tissue position and excess skin. The short follow-up illustrates the reported plan; it does not validate universal claims about inevitable sagging or a single definitive treatment.