12 dated source summaries from 2017-03-30 to 2017-05-08, with original links and related topics.
These English summaries describe the original Korean posts. Dates belong to the source posts. Earlier posts may name Secret, DA or NOTE; those names describe the source’s historical context. Case reports and clinic explanations are kept separate from published research.
In this reflective post, the writer discusses ear-cartilage tip support and the many decisions involved in nasal surgery. A book about changing knowledge prompts a broader argument for humility and continued learning. The post is professional reflection rather than an outcomes study, and its numerical claims about knowledge becoming obsolete are not independently verified here.
This reported case concerns increased wrinkles and a harsher expression after an earlier upper-eyelid operation. The writer describes endoscopic brow lifting and follows early recovery through one month. The discussion considers the forehead, brows and lids together, but comparisons with a lasting toxin effect and broad recovery reassurance should not be interpreted as measured duration or safety evidence.
In this educational post, the writer discusses excessive fullness, palpable lumps and possible discomfort after facial volume procedures. Dissolution and removal are described as different possibilities depending on the material and tissue response. The post links to a press article, so it should be connected as a possible cross-platform version rather than automatically counted as an independent new essay.
This academic account describes a poster on eyelid revision accompanied by lower scleral show. The writer discusses selected situations where opening interference or ptosis may contribute despite no primary lower-lid abnormality. The post also recalls meeting other surgeons and mentions planned publication, which should remain separate from evidence that a journal article was subsequently published.
In this personal essay, the writer reflects on encountering Tadao Ando's architecture and reading his autobiography. The post connects self-directed learning, perseverance and professional humility with the writer's own aspirations as a plastic surgeon. Long book excerpts are present in the source but are not reproduced or presented as the doctor's original writing.
In this research introduction, the writer reports first authorship of a 2016 paper on upper-eyelid hollowness. The post summarizes a treatment-selection concept involving volume, skin descent and, where appropriate, opening function. It introduces the publication's subject rather than reproducing its methods or results, and does not itself supply enough detail to judge comparative effectiveness.
This reported case describes outer-lid irritation and heaviness after an earlier upper-eyelid operation. The writer focuses on lifting the outer brow while explaining that inner and outer brow adjustments depend on anatomy and preference. A ten-day comparison illustrates the plan; historical statements about drains, washing and activity are not a universal recovery protocol.
In this question-and-answer post, a thin-skinned eyelid example introduces discussion of crease size and suitability for buried-suture surgery. The writer explains that a larger fold need not make the eye appear larger and considers skin, volume and opening strength. A ten-day comparison remains an early example, with later refinement described as an expectation.
This reported case concerns a short, firm nose after prior surgery in an overseas patient. The writer describes scar release and ear-cartilage support, then follows the patient's submitted photographs through about one month. The discussion acknowledges tissue handling and postoperative cooperation, but the proposed causes of contracture remain broader commentary rather than a proven cause in this individual.
In this post, the writer discusses vertical lip lines, marionette folds, lip-volume loss and chin dimpling as distinct lower-face concerns. Fillers and toxin treatments are presented as possible approaches for selected goals. The source also acknowledges adverse effects, so its description of materials as harmless should not be repeated as a safety assurance.
In this personal reflection, the writer describes receiving news and photographs from a younger university colleague in Antarctica. The experience prompts thoughts about unconventional careers, uncertainty and taking distance from everyday pressures. The post also includes passages from a book, which are not reproduced here; it is a personal narrative rather than a clinical or professional credential.
This academic report describes two accepted poster topics at the 2016 BAAPS meeting: thread-based treatment of cheek and nasolabial concerns, and augmentation for breast asymmetry. The writer also recalls attending teaching on facial rejuvenation and fat grafting. The post documents a reported educational visit, not proof of superior clinical results or a faculty appointment.