12 dated source summaries from 2026-09-18 to 2026-10-28, with original links and related topics.
These English summaries describe the original Korean posts. Dates belong to the source posts. These posts were published by the ILCHI clinic account. A personal name is attributed only where the source text identifies it. Case reports and clinic explanations are kept separate from published research.
The clinic compares thread lifting, limited-incision lifting and its Ponytail approach by the areas and tissue layers it intends to address. It discusses connected cheek and jawline concerns, previous treatments, incision planning and individualized movement. These are the clinic's procedural descriptions, not comparative study results establishing that one named operation is preferable for every patient.
This clinic explanation considers a descended chin tip and fullness beneath it within a shared lower-face plan. It discusses the mentalis and platysma separately, then describes varying access and fixation with the extent of tissue and skin changes. Facial movement, proportions and postoperative review are included rather than assuming that removing fat alone addresses every concern.
The clinic discusses front-cheek descent and nasolabial fullness as connected concerns when planning Ponytail lifting. It explains tissue release, viewing the operative region with an endoscope, and choosing movement around the existing facial proportions. The text also covers incision planning and follow-up, although its promotional assurances about scarring and recovery are not presented here as guarantees.
This clinic article relates a natural-looking lifting plan to the distribution of midface descent rather than the amount of pulling force. It describes front-cheek, nasolabial and side-cheek assessment, followed by planned tissue release and fixation. The recovery discussion emphasizes individual variation and the need to observe swelling and tissue settling over time.
The clinic announces its use of a Karl Storz endoscopic system and explains the intended role of visualization during tissue release. The article connects that equipment with assessing cheek position, selecting access and planning fixation. It explicitly separates the viewing instrument from the surgeon's decisions about treatment scope and includes a discussion of postoperative monitoring.
In this clinic post, Dr. Moon reports presenting his approach to chin ptosis at a MIPS meeting. He describes distinguishing skeletal projection, descended soft tissue and muscle tension, with different surgical scopes for different findings. The article also recalls earlier presentations and discusses facial movement and recovery; it is a personal presentation report rather than a published comparative study.
The clinic explains why a deeper-looking nasolabial fold may be considered alongside front-cheek and side-cheek position. It describes assessing existing proportions and earlier nonsurgical treatments before selecting the direction and extent of lifting. The discussion links tissue release, movement and fixation, and notes that early swelling can temporarily alter the apparent facial contour.
The clinic examines shoulder-to-waist contrast rather than treating waist circumference as the only planning measurement. It discusses lower-rib direction, the distance between chest and pelvis, surrounding fat and hip proportions. Imaging, incision placement and protection during recovery are included in its account of rib remodeling, with the intended adjustment tied to the existing body rather than maximum narrowing.
The clinic discusses Endotine Ribbon as an optional fixation device within its Ponytail lifting approach. It first describes assessing front-cheek descent and creating space for tissue movement, then explains the intended role of broader tissue support after repositioning. Follow-up and individual planning are included; the article does not supply comparative trial data for its claims about fixation or durability.
The clinic describes a combined plan for concerns involving both the chin tip and the area beneath it. It distinguishes repositioning descended chin tissues from addressing the platysma, then discusses adjusting access and fixation according to severity. The article includes facial proportions, movement during expression and postoperative review, rather than treating the entire lower face as one uniform problem.
This clinic article explains its use of a Karl Storz endoscope during Ponytail lifting. It describes viewing tissue boundaries and adjacent structures while following a planned dissection. The discussion also stresses that equipment does not determine which areas need treatment: assessment of cheek position, asymmetry and the intended movement remains a separate part of surgical planning.
The clinic describes how it assesses front-cheek position, nasolabial fullness and side-cheek descent before planning Ponytail lifting. The article distinguishes creating enough space for tissue movement from indiscriminate dissection, and links the intended movement to fixation and facial balance. It also discusses asymmetric early swelling and follow-up rather than judging the result immediately after surgery.