12 dated source summaries from 2025-05-28 to 2025-06-26, with original links and related topics.
These English summaries describe the original Korean posts. Dates belong to the source posts. These posts were published by the ILCHI clinic account. A personal name is attributed only where the source text identifies it. Case reports and clinic explanations are kept separate from published research.
Evaluating crease height, asymmetry, and scarring before eyelid revision
This clinic article attributed to Dr. Moon discusses revision planning for high or low creases, asymmetry, recurrent crease loss, thick folds, and inner-corner scars. It emphasizes examining muscle use, tissue thickness, attachments, and the existing surgical changes before choosing release and refixation. The discussion also describes staged follow-up, but provides no measured results confirming restoration of comfort or prevention of another unsatisfactory outcome.
In this signed case discussion, Dr. Moon describes a woman with chin descent after T-osteotomy and hardware removal, for whom he planned muscle repositioning, bone-tunnel fixation, and submental tissue removal. A second patient had repeated chin filler before bone surgery and was treated with repositioning plus an external approach to residual filler-associated tissue. The cases illustrate different access decisions based on prior procedures and remaining tissue.
Dr. Moon's clinic article introduces a limited-incision lift for people considering further treatment after dissatisfaction with threads or energy-based procedures. It describes sideburn access, elevation of skin and SMAS, fixation, and closure, with planning based on individual facial structure. Jawline definition and folds around the mouth are presented as aims, but the article includes no patient series measuring satisfaction, durability, or comparative recovery.
Dr. Moon's clinic article discusses upper-lid heaviness, compensatory forehead effort, lower-lid bulging or hollowing, and changes around the eyes. It describes assessing skin, muscle, and fat before selecting upper or lower eyelid surgery, with removal or redistribution considered according to the findings. The stated aim is balancing comfort and appearance. This is a general overview, without documented visual-function measurements or patient outcome comparisons.
This article attributed to Dr. Moon describes chin descent in connection with changed skeletal support, prior fillers or implants, and individual anatomy. It separates muscle-dominant laxity from combined skin and muscle laxity when discussing oral or combined access and fixation. The post also promotes a curved profile design and cites academic activity and patent work, but supplies no registration details or clinical validation study.
Dr. Moon's clinic post describes planning an endoscopic lift around facial proportions, the distribution of descent, and the desired direction of elevation. It outlines scalp access, release of retaining structures, SMAS fixation, and skin redraping, followed by postoperative monitoring. Cheek and eye-area changes are presented as treatment goals. The source provides no outcome measurements establishing reduced complications, invisible scarring, or lasting improvement.
In this clinic overview, Dr. Moon describes a sideburn-region incision, elevation of skin and SMAS, selective excess-skin removal, and closure. Jawline definition and folds around the mouth are presented as possible planning goals, with the direction and strength of lifting adapted to facial structure. The post also lists monitoring and recovery services, without comparative evidence for its claimed advantages over threads or a longer-incision facelift.
Dr. Moon's clinic post discusses eyelid revision as an assessment of existing attachments, scars, tissue volume, and crease design. It describes separating adhesions, adding fat where indicated, adjusting a crease, and addressing an unnatural inner corner. The emphasis is on an individualized plan and follow-up rather than simply repeating the first operation. No documented outcomes demonstrate the advertised prevention of another unsatisfactory result.
This clinic article by Dr. Moon describes the Ponytail approach through limited scalp incisions, endoscopic visualization, ligament release, and deeper fixation. It presents eye-area, cheek, and jawline concerns as parts of a coordinated facial assessment, with skin redistribution and selective removal also mentioned. Diagnostic imaging and postoperative services are advertised, but the article does not provide patient-level data supporting its comparative claims.
Dr. Moon's clinic article describes a mini lift using limited access, elevation of skin and SMAS, redistribution of tissue, and fixation. It links consultation planning to jawline definition, cheek volume, skin characteristics, and prior changes in facial contour. Postoperative care and oxygen treatment are advertised alongside the operation. The post contains no measured outcomes establishing its claims about same-day activity or prolonged maintenance.
In this clinic post, Dr. Moon discusses coordinating chin-muscle repositioning with a mini lift involving skin and SMAS. It frames chin-tip descent and broader cheek or lower-face laxity as linked concerns requiring a shared assessment of proportions and prior surgery. The post outlines separate access and fixation goals for the two operations, but supplies no patient data confirming its promised durability or recovery advantages.
This article by Dr. Moon discusses a drooping chin in relation to prior contour surgery, implants or fillers, and individual tissue structure. It highlights movement-related concerns such as chin dimpling or difficulty closing the lips, then describes oral muscle repositioning or combined access when skin laxity is also present. Facial proportions and profile curvature guide the proposed plan, without documented functional or long-term outcome measurements.